Heroes Created and Destroyed.

In the past weeks, we have been bombarded by the Facebook scandal, recently accused of skirting their responsibilities in protecting users’ data through a relationship with Cambridge Analytica.

Many of us can recall those days or yore when Facebook didn’t exist. If this isn’t you, simply imagine yourself on the subway, on the couch, or at your office desk without having the nuanced details of your closest friends at your fingertips. Those were the days– the pre-Zuckerberg era, if you will.

In 2010, Time Magazine named Mark Zuckerberg Person of the Year. After the successful, if not entirely glowing biopic The Social Network, the world recognized the awkward, quirky Zuckerberg as an American success story.  The Forbes Top-lister and Facebook CEO is reportedly worth more than $36 Billion. He and his wife recently announced they would donate 99% of their Facebook shares’ value over the course of their lifetime. An American-made hero, to be sure.

But that was then.

Just like so many ‘created’ heroes before, Mark Zuckerberg now faces the scrutiny of defending that which he created to the general public, Facebook users and the U.S. Congress. Surely, this was not the big plan.

There is no doubt the world celebrates Zuckerberg and all his success. And, by late 2017, Facebook had a reported 2.2 billion monthly users– nearly a quarter of the earth’s population. The product works. The ‘global village’ first dreamed about in the early 1990’s is now a reality. Facebook is a catalyst for uniting this expansive planet.

Zuckerberg has his enemies, to be sure. Some are competitors, thinking the child-king is too big for his breeches. Others don’t entirely understand the platform and wish him ill. Some are just worried about the future of their identity, and their personal information.

It does seem that America loves to identify these heroes, build them up, and then work to destroy them. Perhaps it is to test their mettle. Perhaps it is jealousy. Perhaps is something far worse– that we never believed in the hero to begin with.

During the hearings on Capitol Hill yesterday, Zuckerberg seemed cool to the touch when questioned by Washington stalwarts. His attire (scrutinized in today’s New York Times) and his drinking from a glass of water (mocked on late night television) combined with his apparent inability to discern when the questions were ‘softballs’ and ‘serious’ makes him a curious figure to all who tuned in.

Frankly, I was more embarrassed to watch these congressmen and congresswomen attempting to ‘understand’ the complex algorithms and structure of Facebook. It was cringe-worthy.

Gawkers watch and criticize every move. Why? I wonder. The Zuckerberg Honeymoon is over, I guess. 

I agree that the third party’s misuse of sensitive data was inappropriate. And I agree that there should be tighter restrictions on the sharing of private information. And I agree that offensive and hate-speech laced advertisements should be edited. And I believe Facebook should employ more diverse engineers. And I agree that Facebook should monitor the possible infringement of these rules by foreign intruders who wish the U.S. ill. And guess what? Mark Zuckerberg does, too. He said so yesterday. On the record.

This man created this thing that we use everyday. It’s free. It’s accessible around the globe. Its goal is for good, not for ill. I like it. My mother-in-law likes it. My kids use it. My high school teachers and choir director connect through it.

What if the narrative was “Fix Facebook, We Love It!” Wouldn’t that be refreshing? At least that would be honest.

And, while many have stated (on Facebook, ironically) that they would leave the social network site, the Facebook platform is still king. Even if Zuckerberg himself is on the brink of being dethroned.


Call it a Multi-Task-Mistake

About a month ago, I was watching one of my favorite television cooking shows, and I saw a respected chef preparing his mis en place (the French term for prepared peeled and sliced ingredients) using a Mandoline (the French-created utensil for quickly slicing and cutting vegetables). Please keep reading– this is not a fancy French lesson.

The Mandoline has always looked to me like a ‘made-for-TV’ item that 1970’s housewives used to impress their Tupperware party guests. So, imagine my surprise seeing this established chef using one on his show. Before the segment cut to commercial, I had grabbed my iPhone, browsed the various models, and chosen my free-two day shipping from my Amazon Prime account. Now, I waited.

The Mandoline arrived, and I immediately inspected it, but it sat mostly untouched in the box for almost 30 days. Until yesterday.

Now, in full disclosure, I must admit that I regularly attempt to ultimate-task. I say ‘attempt’ because it is my general understanding that multi-tasking is impossible: One thing always wins. One thing gets more focus than the other. Also, in full disclosure, I should tell you I am writing this very blog post from a local bookstore while sipping cold brew coffee and listening to the early Beulah recordings of Sir Noel Coward. I know- I am a constant contradiction.

Yesterday, though, I was scheduled to be in New York City. The impending weather report led me to cancel my flight and reschedule my Friday meetings as video conferences instead. After our morning hours of meetings, I decided I would make a quick run to the grocery and gather ingredients to surprise the family with a homemade chicken soup for dinner. I could easily make it back to the house before the afternoon conference began.

When I returned to the house, I assembled my ingredients and utensils, including my new Mandoline. It was the perfect way to get two things done at once: soup and conference call. I would be nearly finished with my prep before the call would begin, and I would easily stand and stir when needed. With my earbuds securely in place, they would have (nearly) my full attention.

As I started on the call, I only had to finish slicing the carrots. Thus far, the Mandoline was a dream. I sliced 2 lbs of celery, two large onions and was nearly through my second pound of carrots when– it happened.

The Mandoline has an exposed blade, with an adjustable base which determines desired thickness. More blade for thicker slices, less blade for thinner pieces. Easy enough. One tends to move quickly when using a Mandoline, because it is just so simple to do. And, the more force you use, the easier the carrots slice. The more engaged you are on a conference call, the more quickly one whizzes through to the nub of a carrot… straight through to the thumb. My thumb.

Let me say, nothing interrupts progress (on the call, or the soup, for that matter) as quickly as a razor-sharp, Japanese-made, French-inspired blade to the first digit of the (previously) confident home chef and marketing executive.

Why, why, why did I think this was a good idea? Why couldn’t I wait twenty minutes until the call was over? Why did I feel that multi-tasking was the right plan? I didn’t. I didn’t think about it at all, and the Mandoline won.

I had shifted focus to the other thing. The call. Naturally. I had allowed the carrot slicing to become out of focus. The slicing action had become so mechanic, so easily repeatable, I didn’t have to think about it. Or did I?

To Task, or to Multi-Task? That is the Question.

I am well aware that there entire books written about the benefits of multi-tasking, and the skills to be achieved at keeping multiple channels of productivity at work at once. Yes, I have seen these, I’ve even read some of them. I’ve learned the terms switchtasking and background tasking, and I might even occasionally understand the difference.

The respected Dr. Sanjay Gupta, CNN Chief Medical Correspondent, claims that it is beyond our brain’s capacity to multitask. He challenges the popular assumption even, claiming the quality of output falls when one attempts to multitask.

“You’re not actually doing both activities at the same time, in fact, you’re now diverting your attention from one part of your brain to another part of your brain. That takes time, that takes resources, that takes brain cells.” (Your Brain on Multitasking, CNN, Mon., Aug 1, 2016)

It is a lesson I learn time and again. Or, perhaps I should say, it is a lesson I am reminded of time and again. I am not sure I have learned it at all. I continue to grab my iPhone at red lights while driving. I check emails during dinner or while watching television. And, I slice vegetables while on conference calls.

I prefer to be singularly focused. I am thrilled when I can shut my office door and begin writing or creating art for a project. I love when I have nothing else to do but prepare a meal for the family. But alas, productivity and goals and interruptions often win. Or in my case– productivity and the Mandoline.

I failed to mention the (now) hilarious and ironic scene that took place immediately after sending a portion of my thumb into the veggie bowl. “Umm, guys– I think I am going to need to, er, umm, ohhhh boy. I’m gonna have to bounce off the call.”

Blood was everywhere, my arm now above my head, trying to race to bathroom, only to find the gauze box empty. In the vanity drawer, there were a handful of bandages, all individually wrapped, and some cotton balls. “You alright, George?” asked our partner, Brian. “Yeah, well– er, not really.” And then the members of the conference all proceeded to give me instructions, “Keep it above your head, You’ll need a tourniquet, I’ll bet you’ll need stitches.”

Multitask, indeed.

I endeavored to unwrap a plastic bandage with my left hand and my teeth, to little success, actually gagging and choking at one point on a small piece of wrapper. Every time I instinctually lower my right hand to aid in the mess, blood would spew everywhere. All the while, still on the conference call. The effort to disconnect from the call would require removing my iPhone from my pocket, and using my right thumb to unlock the screen. This was becoming ridiculous. Would my thumbprint even work anymore? Now I was distracted by this horrible predicament- what if I can’t unlock my phone? What then?

Everything was, of course– just fine. There’s a code for the phone. There’s talk-to-text. And there’s masking tape and cotton balls. I called my wife to request she stop and pick up some gauze and bandages, and told her I’d manage until she got home.

When my wife and son got home, we re-bandaged my silly wound, cleaned up the trail of blood from kitchen to bathroom, and sat down to enjoy my piping hot soup. And checked our iPhones. And watched Wheel of Fortune. Oh well.

When in “Roam”

I am sure I am already dating myself by using this olde-tyme phrase, but it makes sense to me.

Remember when we used to “roam?”

For those of you reading this who were born after (gulp) 1999, there once was a time that our mobile phones would declare we had strayed beyond the comfortable limits of our homeland. Or, more easily put, they would blink orange or red lights and display the phrase “Roaming.” The undesired side-effect of that status was an immediate decrease in device capabilities– you couldn’t use all the features of your phone. And, when you did- they were increasingly expensive. Think “airplane mode.”

The technological side of this was something like, you were outside your network, or you had a poor signal, or something like that. (This is the part where it becomes painfully obvious that I’m the ‘make it look pretty guy’, not the ‘tech guy’). Hang in there, I have a point.

Virtually every time you would jump in your car, or board the train or subway, your phone would move to the “Roaming” status. I, like everyone else, would be instantly enraged, longing for a better signal, a better network, and occasionally- a better device.

The unprescribed side-effect of that archaic technology was humans, from time-to-time, would put their device away, and look around, read a book, and sometimes (though rarely)- interact with other human beings.

Today, I am available. All the time. Or, at least my iPhone thinks I am.

I recently found a handy little setting on my phone that allows me to set ‘quiet hours’- times that I am unreachable. Because I value my five hours of evening respite, I created the times of 12:30 a.m. – 5:50 a.m. as my private time. How delightful, right?

CBS This Morning co-host John Dickerson recently experimented with attempts to “shut down” his screens: computers, tablets and mobile devices. It was painful to watch. Embarrassing, actually. A recent study found Americans look at their phones more than 40 times each hour. Oh, dear.

We Will Never Get That Time Back

I have two sons, ages 20 and 15. Occasionally, I impart my wisdom (frustration) upon them regarding their use (misuse) of their devices. And, I know I instantly sound like an old man. So be it.

When I sit down, after a long day, I have a choice to make: What will I do with my time?

My problem with their answer to that question is not that they spend time on their devices, but rather, what they are doing while on those devices. The time spent trolling Twitter, or Snapchat or Instagram is all reactive time, or- time that we allow others to orchestrate. If some Silicon Valley algorithms determine you should see this ad, or that article, that is what it sends to your eyeballs first. And, I am savvy enough to understand that those decisions are being made by algorithms- not human beings. And, certainly not by my sons.

Compare this arbitrary allotment of time spent on social media with the proactive decision to choose a novel or a newspaper or a book with a title or subject of interest, and investing a set amount of time with that content. Investing that time in a subject or topic. Undisturbed.

Now- I know, I know, books and articles and newspapers can all be read on tablets and devices. But, who chooses to first place their phones or devices on “silent mode” or “airplane mode” or “do not disturb.” None of us.

We think we need the disturbances. Because they are so important. Every employee checks email on the weekends. Every boss sends texts after hours. It’s dangerously similar to working around the clock.

Now, I am not suggesting that we abandon every device, and delete our social media accounts. However, perhaps we think twice when evaluating our “notifications.”

And- I apologize if the “alert’ of this blog post interrupted you today.

“Your smile is a gift”- and other suggestions for better service.

Okay, to be fair, I considered some pretty harsh headlines for this post.

“Really? Your life cannot be that horrible” was one of them. I also contemplated using, “I’m the one being asked to remove my shoes and belt.”

Why such a title? You guessed it. I’m writing this from gate B3 at O’hare International Airport. And the headline I finally arrived at is a direct reflection of my experience with the disgruntled TSA agent today. It’s not a new story, and it certainly isn’t exciting. She was mad, frustrated, or generally unhappy. Perhaps she has encountered inexperienced travelers today. Maybe she is working an extra shift. Or, quite possibly, her airport lunch didn’t meet her expectations. Nonetheless, she was not having it today. And by ‘it’, I mean “general happiness and smiling customers.

That’s right. Today, the customers were all jovial, accommodating, and generally happy people, all trying to make it to their destinations. I was one of those. Shoes removed, belt in the bin, and smile upon my face. I was headed to sunny Florida (for work), where I would soon encounter a 57 degree temperature increase. Bring it.

But, Helga (not her real name) wasn’t interested. She was barking orders, and scowling at the floor. Not making eye contact, not smiling. Barely communicating. In fact, Helga was pretty much yelling at us. We know the rules. We are at the United Premier Access security line. This is not our first rodeo, Helga.

Now- I value the presence of safety officers. I think we all do. And I am sure it’s not the most rewarding career on the planet. But Helga was convinced we were all school children who needed reprimanding.

Keeping It Real

Here’s the thing: just yesterday I gathered our entire creative team to discuss the importance on quality customer service. Not that the team needed this reminder. In fact, much of our time together was sent commending individuals for value-added productivity and communication that is making our work so much fun. But I wanted to be sure we understood how important the customer is to the work we do.

Every task we tackle, every piece of fancy art we create, every video, photo and story we dream up means little if the client isn’t satisfied and thrilled with the work. And, as a pleaser myself, I can say I have a hard time sleeping at night when the customer is less than thrilled with my work. But it goes beyond the finished project. Customer satisfaction begins at the beginning.

There’s a reason every meeting in our office includes a pot of freshly-brewed (freshly roasted) coffee at the table. It’s right to offer your guests a beverage and a comfy place to sit for the next 30-40 minutes together. I would do the same in my own home. But it starts even before that.

It’s starts at “hello.”

That smile that greets the welcome is also paramount. Every step of the way, a friendly smile is the perfect accompaniment to a quality customer-client relationship. Now, video meetings and phone calls and emails may make that difficult, so when we are face-to-face, it is vital that we look each other in the eyes (“heads up, Helga”) and acknowledge the humanity in our brothers and sisters around us.

Helga was having issues, yes. But I decided to respond with the only tool I had in that moment. I ignored Helga’s barking, and waited for her to make eye contact with me. Then I blasted her with a smile, and said, “Thanks, Helga.” That was enough for me. I doubt it made much difference to her. But, as humans – we saw each other. Then we moved on with our days. That’s enough for now.

$330 Sneakers? Maybe.

A fascinating article in GQ today examined the current alarming status of the sneaker market.

That’s right– tennis shoes, gym shoes, kicks– whatever you call ’em, the market is booming. And not just for new items, either. The after-sale market is presently valued at $2 billion, with the ath-leisure market expected to be worth $83 billion by the year 2020, according to some analysts.

In the early 1980’s the footwear trend hit my hometown, a suburb of Detroit. And I had to have them. All I had to do was convince my parents that the $40 price tag was worthwhile. It wouldn’t be easy– we’d never spent more than $25 on shoes, and those were dress shoes. My parents scoffed at the idea.

Today, a $40 pair of quality sneakers can be near impossible to find.

After Christmas this year, our family decided to have a ‘stay-cation’ in Chicago. Since we live here, we often don’t do the touristy things, so once every year, we try to be tourists for a day or so. We visit museums and eat pizza and drink too much coffee.

As a special treat, I thought I would jet my boys to a couple of the “hippest” sneaker shops  while we were nearby. (Thank you Google for making this middle-aged dad appear, even momentarily, kinda cool.)

What I found inside the minimalist, tiny, privately-owned shop surprised even me: white walls, bare floors, plywood shelving and industrial pipe racks. This was the place?

Now, let me be clear: I have literally seen closets on the north shore that rival the square footage of this shop. But, here, on a blustery December day, I found a welcoming shop owner and a small community of enthusiasts who were pleased to show us their latest acquisitions. My sons were wide-eyed. And, I admit, I was taken by it all.

The sneakers in this shop are unique. Most are unavailable at retail outlets, and here they are sold at a premium- with few at retail prices. The curating of such items comes at a cost. The average price of a premium, after-market sneaker these days is $330.

Each of my sons, age 20 and 15, would pick up a sneaker, examine it from every angle, holding it up to spy the unique stitching and fabric dyes. And to be honest, I haven’t seen them take an interest like this, other than the screens of their phones.

What is it about this place? They’re just tennis shoes, right?

Wrong. It’s the community that the individuality and specificity of the brands affords the consumer. There are Adidas folks. Nikes folks. And then, those others who want the custom, gold-plated designer shoes. My boys save their hard-earned dollars to buy tennis shoes. Ridiculous? Maybe not.  My youngest has even taken to buying premium sneakers on their ‘drop date’ and reselling them online at a premium. And he’s making good, real money.

We bought shoes that day. That’s right, we. I bought a pair, too. To be fair, they were on sale for $50. And I love them. houndstooth

Read GQ article here.







Difficult, yet Rewarding


George Wolff

This Sunday’s New York times featured a terrific article about an exciting and popular new class offered at Yale University, “Yale’s Most Popular Class Ever: Happiness.”

‘Psychology and the Good Life’ taught by Yale professor Laurie Santos, “tries to teach students how to lead a happier, more satisfying life,” according to the article by David Shimer. The course was so well received, it had to be moved to a larger location to accommodate the crowds or registrants.

Santos fights the mischaracterization of what many assume will be a fluff course. She surmises that Yale students ‘reprioritized’ their own happiness in high school to attain ivy league acceptance. Hmmmm. And while that seems like a typical response to this millennial generation, she also thinks hers is the “hardest class at Yale.”

Really? Happiness is the toughest course at Yale? 

She goes on to explain that the social pressures of taking a course with friends that calls students to be held accountable for their actions and their habits is truly unique and challenging.

My entire college experience was that course.

Though I studied music performance in my undergrad, I did so at a small, liberal arts college that encouraged proficiency across all aspects of academia. Music theory, performance studies, and aural skills may have been the focus of my degree, but the cornerstone of my education lay in the core curriculum and understanding of art, literature, religion and the sciences.

Though a liberal arts education isn’t for everyone, I found the value of my focused degree in the variable academia across campus. And, perhaps because it was a smaller college, my ‘general studies’ professors always encouraged my featured major in their individual concentrations.

I recall being in a literature course where my professor called me to study, in depth, the texts of the music I had been studying. Cracking into Voltaire as I studied Bernstein’s Candide, and discovering the text of Shubert’s Winterreise. But it went beyond these obvious illustrations.

During my sophomore year, my roommate was killed in a van accident. He was one of three friends who lost their lives while on our university choir tour. It was difficult for all of us, but I took it especially hard. My older, resident-director roommate had become a mentor to me, and I looked up to him.

With him gone, I expected I would be alone. I was wrong.

Instead, I found a campus (what seemed like an entire campus) that was now stepping in, ready to support me in my college career: professors, students, staff. The entire community was there to support me and help me cross the finish line– well.

Because of this tragedy, I assumed it was all for me. I assumed these fine people were investing in me because I had experienced some great tragedy. I am happy to say the was not the case.

My conversations with other graduates of my fine college tell a virtually identical story of their experience: professors inviting them to their homes for family dinners; one-on-one meetings to discuss life and all its complexities; and random phone calls to “check-in” on them. Apparently, our professors had collectively decided to ‘not give up’ on us.

Perhaps this happens at every college. Perhaps not.

My undergraduate experience was an eye-opening, challenging, stretching venture into the world of who I would become. I cannot say enough how grateful I am for the men and women who devoted their lives to their knowledge and skill and craft, and chose to invest in my life.

And, while I may have never taken a course entitled ‘Happiness,‘ I feel as if my undergraduate experience did provide such an experience.


Read David Shimer’s article here



More, From Less

MUJI as inspiration for our work

I’ve been toting around the most recent Harvard Business Review since it landed in my office several weeks ago– I kept meaning to get to it. Mainly, I wanted to be sure to take adequate time to digest “How I Did It” by Masaaki Kanai, chairman of Ryohin Keikaku– parent company of MUJI.

Now, you may have no idea what MUJI is, but trust me- you will.

MUJI is a line of sustainably designed, inexpensive, nondescript, non-branded  housewares and clothing, launched in 1980. Chances are, unless you live near a booming university town or a major metropolitan area, you’ve never stepped foot inside a MUJI store. And you certainly haven’t seen their advertisements, because they don’t believe in them.

I first discovered MUJI when I was living in Brooklyn Heights, outside New York. I stepped into their Manhattan store and immediately was taken by their minimalist concept. And anyone who knows me knows that I am anything but a minimalist.

But MUJI was different. It was so decidedly practical, and, well– necessary. Every item I saw, I thought I needed. Including their fashion. On that first visit alone, I purchased $300 in tee shirts, socks, a toothbrush holder and travel gear, a sweater for my wife, poncho, and two scarves that had been conveniently shrink-wrapped to the size of a Rubik’s cube.

As I strolled the store that day, I never realized that that my overpriced suit and shoes and topcoat and briefcase were the height of contradiction. I longed for the MUJI simplicity, and I decided to partake in all they had to offer.

Kanai credits the store’s universal (and now global) success to this concept, I like to say that MUJI goods should be like water: of universal appeal.” He also credits the adherence to a “uniform vision and execution” as key to MUJI’s success.

Kanai goes on to say, “Our aim is not to grow as large as we can. It is to be tenacious in our quest to deliver on the MUJI promise and to be of use in the lives of people around the world.” (Harvard Business Review, Jan-Feb 2018)

How are we doing?

It got me to thinking: how are you doing in this area? Are you delivering on your company’s promises, and are you helpful to people around the world? Regardless of your product or sales category, your quest is to make an impact in the world, but primarily, in an individual’s life. In one life.

Kanai’s challenge is a good one, and I hope the simple concept of MUJI can inspire you to discover anew your mission and then, go boldly (or in MUJI’s case, simply) in the direction of your purpose.


You can read “How I Did It” by clicking here: https://hbr.org/2018/01/the-chairman-of-ryohin-keikaku-on-charting-mujis-global-expansion

Fearless? Really?

Creatives: don’t buy the “be fearless” hype! In her exceptional book, Big Magic, author Elizabeth Gilbert distinguishes between ‘the fear you need and the fear you don’t need.’

“If your goal in life is to become fearless, then I believe you’re already on the wrong path, because the only truly fearless people I’ve ever met were straight up sociopaths and a few exceptionally reckless three-year-olds – and those aren’t good role models for anyone.”
-Elizabeth Gilbert, Big Magic

Big Magic